Saturday, February 11, 2012

Is Disobedience and Violence the true foundation of liberty?

Civil disobedience is the public act of willfully disobeying the law and the commands of an authority figure, to make a political statement. Participants are in risk of getting arrested, and are frequently charged with crimes such failure to disperse, or failure to obey an officer. Civil disobedience is generally nonviolent.
The purpose of civil disobedience is to convey a political message; their goal is to bring changes in the law. Nowadays, civil disobedience has been used in such events as street demonstrations, marches, and strikes... Also, sometimes the law gets broken and they start protesting, it sends the message to authority figures that people consider the law so unjust, they are willing to openly disobey it. Martin Luther King, M.Gandhi and Henry David Thoreau are famous advocates of civil disobedience.

The Civil Disobedience Movement was first led by Gandhi; in the year 1930. He started it because he wanted public opinions to be heard but in a nonviolent civil way. It is considered as a very important milestone in the history of Indian Nationalism. There are three distinct phases that mark the development of Indian Nationalism.  One of those phases was the rise of as M.Gandhi, to power as the leader of Indian National Movements. He was amiable by all the citizens because of his spirited guidance and wise decisions. 


Martin Luther King just like Gandhi was a leader in his community and believed that civil disobedience was the way to change the laws and feeling that where against the colored people in southern states of America. He had a dream and believed that the only way to get his point across is by taking action but the actions had to be in a non-violent way and without any violent juncture or physical force. He said that the movement must prove the wrong that has been done to the black citizens and why are opposing something or someone. King justified his act of civil disobedience by show that there was a lot of hatred towards the Negroes by the country police and court systems.

Both Martin Luther King and Gandhi started the civil disobedience movement because they saw people suffering, dying and living in misery because of the unjust prosecution of their country. They wanted to spread justice and put an end to the laws that where against their people as unjust because it affected them in all sorts of ways.  Both leaders felt that not everything that was legal was based on justice and that’s why they believed that civil disobedience is the way to make justice with an unjust legal law.

In my opinion I think that thanks to them now the world knows a non-violent way to oppose what they think is wrong. Civil disobedience in 2012 is the most common movement to oppose something in Arab countries…

The past few weeks I’ve been hearing a lot about this movement called civil disobedience that was going to be held on the 11th of February 2012. I had to clue what was it was and to me it was totally insignificant maybe because I’m not interested in my countries politics and I belittle everything that has to do with the Egyptian revolution. But after doing some researches and reading amazing stories of leaders that were willing to sacrifice their souls to what they believed in made me want to participate myself in The Egyptian Civil Disobedience. I think that Civil disobedience is a very powerful tool but it must be used with thought, care and bravery to be effective. Of course every single Egyptian want the best for its beloved country that’s why for the past year we have been witnessing an ongoing process of protesting and strikes.  Of course Egypt is in need of the civil disobedience movement, but since I began writing my essay I couldn’t stop questioning myself: are the Egyptians capable of starting a none-violent movement? I don’t think so, Egyptians have tried peaceful ways to express their opinions but sadly it always ends up with blood of innocent ones scattered all around the streets… Why? Well because half of the Egyptians are uneducated, they don’t understand what the True meaning of CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IS. To conclude my essay I would like to point out two main points, first of all Egypt is not in need of more strikes, protests and revolutions it is certainly in need of AN EVOLUTION so I think that Egyptian Civil disobedience will only make any difference cut it will make us drowned deeper and deeper. Second of all the term civil disobedience starts with a very important adjective “Civil”, Do you think that in 2012 Egyptian citizens are acting in a civil way? I don’t think so, how can uncivil people starts a movement they don’t even understand and proclaim it for the best of their country?
  















Ghandi Quote:
“Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state has become lawless or corrupt. And a citizen who barters with such a state shares in its corruption and lawlessness...Every citizen is responsible for every act of his government...There is only one sovereign remedy, namely, non-violent non-cooperation.  Whether we advertise the fact or not, the moment we cease to support the government it dies a nature death....My method is conversion, not coercion, it is self-suffering, not the suffering of the tyrant....I hope the real Swaraj (self-rule) will come not by the acquisition of authority by the few but by the acquisition by all of the courage to resist authority when abused.  In other words, Swaraj is to be attained by education the masses to a sense of their capacity to regulate ad control authority.... Civil disobedience is the assertion of a right which law should give but which it denies...Civil disobedience presupposes willing obedience of our self-imposed rules, and without it civil disobedience would be cruel joke....Civil disobedience means capacity for unlimited suffering without the intoxicating excitement of killing....Disobedience to be civil has to be open and nonviolent....Disobedience to be civil implies discipline, thought, care, attention...Disobedience that is wholly civil should never provoke retaliation....Non-cooperation and civil disobedience are different but [are] branches of the same tree call Satyagraha (truth-force).... Coercion cannot but result in chaos in the end....One who uses coercion is guilty of deliberate violence. Coercion is inhuman....Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with good... Nonviolent action without the cooperation of the heart and the head cannot produce the intended result....All through history the way of truth and love has always won.  There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall, always.”

No comments:

Post a Comment